Is Google really ignoring .NET Plugins?

Casuality helps you to discover interesting things...

On a quick Google's search for a .NET plugin for Google Desktop Sidebar, I've discovered Rob Chartier's blog, a guy that loves to write plugins for Google tools.

He has written some interesting plugins and some of them are open source, but now I'd like to put in evidence a strange fact: seems that Google hates .NET plugins!

Rob has tryed many times to submit his plugin (written in C#) to Google, they've tested it and the response was always that the plugin is written in .NET, so it's too much memory consuming.

Really? Is it really impossible to write a .NET plugin for Google? I know that a .NET application can be more memory consuming than the same application written for example in C++, but managed code has also lots of advantages.

Google, tell me the truth: is it really a memory reason or (maybe) a commercial reason?

Print | posted on Friday, September 23, 2005 9:34 AM

Comments on this post

No comments posted yet.

Your comment:

 (will show your gravatar)
 
Please add 3 and 3 and type the answer here: