SubText and its attention to spam

I'm glad to see that guys involved on the SubText project (a re-engineering of .Text blog engine) are thinking a lot to fight spam at 360°.

The last discussion is centered around a problem present at the moment and that we've discussed a lot also on my blog: the CommentAPI. This API permits you to activate a service that allows your readers to make comments to your blog directly from their favorite RSS Aggregator, but this comfort has a big side-effect: by enabling the CommentAPI you will open a back door for spammers that can easily bypass your CAPTCHA filter and post comments.

To have a flexible blog structure, the best choice could be to have the possibility to enable or disable all the comment services (and trackbacks too) as you want (maybe via an administrator interface) but I think also that by closing all these service you'll have a more secure blog but also a "closed to the world" blog.

If you close the CommentAPI service (just like if you close the possibility to comment a post), how many readers will be happy? Not too much I think... Blogs are borned to be commented.

I think that a built-in antispam filter must be implemented to the core of the blog engine (so you can turn on all the comment services but inserted text will be natively filtered) and here the choice are opened: how to implement a native filter? By modifying the SQL at the bottom level (maybe inserting the possibility to manage a spam table via the admin interface of your blog) or implement filtering on the API code?

What will be the best choice?

Print | posted on Wednesday, June 15, 2005 9:55 AM

Comments on this post

No comments posted yet.

Your comment:

 (will show your gravatar)
 
Please add 5 and 6 and type the answer here: