Innovation?

I'm a regular Windows user (at work and at home) but I use also OS like Linux (I've done my Engineering Thesys on Linux some years ago). I'm a Linux estimator (for me it's a very interesting OS), but I hate the Linux fans that says that "Linux is better than Windows", "Linux is more secure than Windows" or "Linux is more innovative than Windows"... however, I could understand the fans of an OS (is something like the fans of a footbal team ).

What hurts me is something like the fact that I've just read on ZDNet.

Matt Asay, Novell's director of Linux Business Office, said at the Linux User and Developer Expo 2004 in London that Linux threatened the proprietory software industry with innovation, rather than extinction, and accused companies such as Microsoft of failing to come up with exciting new applications.

Exclamation like "When was the last time that Microsoft Office got significantly better? It's been pretty much the same product for a while now" or "As things stand, creativity has gone, and that's one reason that Linux on the desktop makes sense. It'll be good for Microsoft, too. They won't like it, but it will force them to innovate" seems a little bit arrogant...

Print | posted on Wednesday, April 21, 2004 5:02 PM

Comments on this post

# re: Innovation?

Requesting Gravatar...
Very true Stefano..
I dont know why they do that. Its like they just want to build walls around their community and thus prove that they have somehting precious inside.
Left by Roshan James on Apr 21, 2004 10:54 PM

# re: Innovation?

Requesting Gravatar...
It's not arrogant. It's plain damn stupid. I mean...what do you expect? The guy is "Novell's director of Linux Business Office"....the only thing he can probably do is talk out of his ass. And this is waht he's doing.....

Left by Gheorghe Marius on Apr 21, 2004 11:25 PM

# re: Innovation?

Requesting Gravatar...
It may be a little arrogant, but it contains a significant truth: why making innovation if you're not compelled by the market? When your share is more than 90%, the best thing a management can do is to change nothing. Microsoft stopped the development of IE when reached total web browser domination, and then thay concentrated they investements in other sectors where they were significant weaker (e.g. .NET technologies).

From users' perspective could rise also the doubt about the necessity of all this innovation: who needs more or better features in Office? The suite already answers to all office needs, and many functionalities are unused by the average Joe user. So what? It's the vendor in this case that pushes for newer features: because these new features may lead to incompatibilities with older versions, forcing user to upgrade, therefore making cash...

Left by Genesio on Apr 24, 2004 9:05 AM

Your comment:

 (will show your gravatar)
 
Please add 5 and 5 and type the answer here: